soegaard2
2018-11-4 14:07:31

@macocio Not with standard structs. The field names aren’t available at runtime, so if a is bound to a struct, there is no way to know which field b refers to. There might be a package that does something similar though.


cwmiller.2005
2018-11-4 21:28:17

@cwmiller.2005 has joined the channel


diego
2018-11-5 00:52:18

@diego has joined the channel


diego
2018-11-5 00:58:00

Howdy - I am new to Racket and got drawn in by rash (http://rash-lang.org/) - is there a channel for rash, or where would questions/discussions about it go?


diego
2018-11-5 00:58:32

(BTW I know LISPs in general, mostly emacs-lisp and Clojure, but I don’t know much about Racket specifically)


andreiformiga
2018-11-5 01:28:39

I don’t think there’s a dedicated channel for rash yet


diego
2018-11-5 01:47:07

@andreiformiga right, I couldn’t find one either. Might be interesting. I wonder if anyone is using rash as their full-time shell at the moment.


diego
2018-11-5 01:47:43

I am currently using Elvish (elv.sh), but I find rash fascinating. In fact I looked at it before discovering Elvish, but it was much less evolved then, I recently looked at it again and I’m impressed.


andreiformiga
2018-11-5 01:52:23

I’ve been meaning to try it


macocio
2018-11-5 02:00:55

I didn’t know about Rash, I’ve always wanted to use Racket in my repl. Gonna try this!