notjack
2020-1-9 08:27:34

Would anyone object to adding GitHub Actions CI to the RackUnit repo? The current travis CI setup for it seems to have been busted for a while now.


pocmatos
2020-1-9 09:52:48

I never committed anything there and don’t even know who’s the responsible for that one. But it sounds like a good idea to move things to Actions.


pocmatos
2020-1-9 09:53:31

according to https://github.com/racket/racket/wiki/Release-repo-managers the responsible for the repo is @ryanc


samth
2020-1-10 03:43:34

@notjack sounds like a good idea. I think just opening a PR is the right way forward.


samth
2020-1-10 03:45:11

The racket core tests long-predate rackunit. And they don’t really want to depend on them (or on anything). I think trying to change that test framework isn’t really worth it.


notjack
2020-1-10 03:46:30

@samth is that test framework documented somewhere?


samth
2020-1-10 03:47:27

No. I also would strongly recommend not using it for anything else. But having internal docs for it would be nice.