@archive-bot has joined the channel
@jsyeo set the channel topic: Racket — http://racket-lang.org — http://pasterack.org - Slack invite link: http://racket-slack.herokuapp.com - Archives: http://racket.slackarchive.io/
@jsyeo: Thanks for setting up the IRC gateway!
@kimmyg has joined the channel
@bmastenbrook has joined the channel
@cadr has joined the channel
:wave:
@dan.burton has joined the channel
@ben has joined the channel
@jamesswaine has joined the channel
@leif that’s up to you
@nadeem has joined the channel
@jbclements has joined the channel
yes, that’s right
IRC channel*
k, cool.
BTW, @samth I’m curious why we chose to go with a duel Apache and X11/MIT license?
(Not complaining, it just seems very bizarre to me.)
@leif Did you read what I said about that in the email?
Yes, although looking at it again, I missed that the rust project also does it.
Now I’m curious why the rust project does it, but that’s a thing I’ll have to ask them.
(Like, mostly just curious what you want out of X11/MIT that apache doesn’t have, unless its just a more simple license agreement.)
@0x41e has joined the channel
Okay @samth , next silly question. The context is: why are we holding off on changing the license on the C code? (Yes I read the email), actual question: Are the LGPL libraries we are linking to done via static links?
(If so that would explain why we are holding off on the licensing the C code, otherwise it seems odd to me.)
They aren’t really libraries in that sense — the code is directly incorporated into racket
GNU lightning in particular is heavily modified in-tree.
as is GMP
AH…okay
Ya, if we’ve linked them in that tightly that totally makes sense.
Thanks. :smile:
I guess that is just more motivation to get the runtime done in racket. :wink:
Anyway, thanks.
@jao has joined the channel
@apg has joined the channel
@pnwamk has joined the channel
@eeide has joined the channel
Hi, all. I’m Eric Eide at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Hey @eeide welcome to the club
There’s been a lot of new additions here, was some announcement made or something?
@notjack yes, on the mailing list
@smtuttle has joined the channel
@jesus has joined the channel
@philip.mcgrath has joined the channel
@vishesh has joined the channel
Does anyone know if a class that implements stream<%>
can be converted to a class that uses the same interface as editor-stream-in%
?
Like, the docs for stream<%>
even reference the exact same methods for editor-stream-in%
…
Is there an IRS recognized body that has ownership rights to Racket? As an example, the Python language has the Python Software Foundation. Does such a thing exist for Racket?
Ah. It seems there is PLT Design Inc.
But, perhaps it’s not a registered Non-Profit?
(I’m trying to figure out how I can use work time to contribute to racket as part of my companies volunteer time off program)