notjack
2017-6-27 21:11:48

@ben responded to #48, assuming your approval means it’s good to merge


notjack
2017-6-27 21:12:58

death to the monads :tada:


ben
2017-6-27 21:24:10

yep! I just had those little questions


notjack
2017-6-27 21:27:17

thanks for all the reviews :)


ben
2017-6-27 21:28:25

of course, I’m just a concerned user of Rackunit. Thanks for all the improvements


notjack
2017-6-27 23:54:34

would it be inappropriate for rackunit to depend on syntax/parse?


lexi.lambda
2017-6-27 23:55:28

I doubt it would be a problem, given that syntax/parse is in base


notjack
2017-6-27 23:56:21

I’m less worried about package dependencies and more worried about test execution speed slowing down if loading syntax/parse is expensive


lexi.lambda
2017-6-27 23:57:27

I guess that’s a valid concern, yeah


notjack
2017-6-27 23:58:30

but I have no idea how expensive loading syntax/parse is


samth
2017-6-28 00:28:51

It should be fine


guannanwei
2017-6-28 01:14:47

@guannanwei has joined the channel


zenspider
2017-6-28 03:37:19

Is there a way to “run” an input file as if it had a #lang xxx line at the front… basically say eval this port/file/whatever with xxx lang?


zenspider
2017-6-28 03:38:02

I want to write a more “traditional” style of tool, then have that slurp into racket as if it were a .rkt file with a proper #lang