greg
2020-4-24 13:57:46

Well it seems to be working again, now.


greg
2020-4-24 14:02:32

(Later yesterday, while it continued to not-work, I thought about changing the script to try both Utah and Northeastern. I even started on that. But my Bash fu is weak, so I think I’ll abandon that for now. (This was a detour from trying to improve some tests for Racket Mode. So I’m relieved to “pop the stack”, stop messing with infrastructure, and resume what I was trying to do. Maybe someday, later.))


spdegabrielle
2020-4-24 14:12:18

Thats probably a good question to ask at the racket-users group -you can use it as an email list or via gg web interface https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/racket-users


spdegabrielle
2020-4-24 14:13:28

leo814
2020-4-24 15:07:32

@leo814 has joined the channel


tlcu
2020-4-24 15:15:02

@tlcu has joined the channel


greg
2020-4-24 16:15:03

And… now it’s broken again. :anguished:


nbtheduke
2020-4-24 21:10:39

if I wrote a library in clojure, and i took inspiration from something in racket by reading the racket source code, do i have to include racket’s license alongside my chosen license?


samth
2020-4-24 21:17:13

@nbtheduke it’s hard to give specific information, but if your code is a derived work of the Racket code, then you need to follow the Racket license.


nbtheduke
2020-4-24 21:18:20

and not include my own?


samth
2020-4-24 21:19:45

follwoing the racket license just means complying with the terms, not necessarily using the same license. Gnereally, Racket’s license is very permissive so you should probably be fine.


nbtheduke
2020-4-24 21:31:11

Cool, thanks. I’ll give it a finer read to see!