I believe sending an email to should work to subscribe if you don’t have(or want) a google account, but I’ve been unable to successfully test this subscription method as the Join This Group
link in the confirmation email is https://groups.google.com/group/racket-users/subscribe\|https://groups.google.com/group/racket-users/subscribe rather than a subscription confirmation link.
Can anyone else test this with a non-google linked email account? (Please ‘reply in thread’)
EDIT: replying to the email allows you to subscribe without a google account. Thank you @samdphillips
Assuming the above is confirmed :arrow_right:Is needing a Google account a problem for subscribing to the mailing list?
:large_blue_circle: no it’s not a problem for me :large_orange_circle: yes needing a g account is a problem for me. (Replies ‘in thread’ please)
@pmenair has joined the channel
> In order for us to complete the request, please reply to this email I replied to the email and did not have to use a google account at all.
The web ui does force you into having an account though.
I probably should try reading ! The token is in the subject.
We’ve all been trained to click on the buttons :slightly_smiling_face:
mentioned this before: https://blog.discourse.org/2018/11/free-hosting-for-open-source-v2/ , but discourse forums provide free hosting for open source projects. Its a nicer alternative to google groups but idk who from the racket team is willing to claim it and migrate everything over…
> (struct Empty ())
> (struct Cons ([car : Integer] [cdr : (U Empty Cons)]))
; readline-input:6:46: Type Checker: parse error in type;
; type name `Cons' is unbound
; in: Cons
; [,bt for context]
doesn’t work in the REPL w/ racket -I typed/racket
, but works when entered in a file. is this a bug
obviously this is not very important, though
“toplevel is hopeless” ?
The DrRacket REPL also doesn’t work
I was looking into this on StackOverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66243289/how-to-define-a-recursive-struct-in-typed-racket seems like this may be that issue
but again the obvious solution is to put it in a file
My very wild guess would be that #%top-interaction
of Typed Racket is buggy
It’s really that the top level is hopeless
And there could be but probably isn’t a specific workaround for this
is there an option for “it’s not a problem for me personally but it’s still a problem”