AX BZ CY.
The AX gives us hope! The BZ is closer to a non-review and is largely positive.
The CY review starts with ‘Wow’. It seems we got knocked purely on ‘technically dense’. [Obviously this person has never read any recent paper from Patrick Cousot!] And, of course, I have some sympathy with reviewer A’s point-of-view…
I think our response is going to be rather easy to write — there is very little to respond to!
If it gets rejected this time, I seriously think we should go to a journal instead. [No, I’m not going to suggest we split it into several papers, not yet anyways.]
the C review’s only real complaint is that we have too many contributions
so that should be easy to respond to
How would you respond to that, in a way to hopefully get C’s response to move to at least a B?
@samth I just want to make sure that the snark you put in the beginning is calculated.
It’s intentional, but maybe not a good idea