InfoWorld: C++ 23 to introduce module support. https://www.infoworld.com/article/3662808/c-plus-plus-23-to-introduce-module-support.html\|https://www.infoworld.com/article/3662808/c-plus-plus-23-to-introduce-module-support.html
> […] features such as pattern matching, contracts, and a general model for concurrency (executors) will have to wait until C++ 26.
And people ask me why I don’t code in C++ rather than Racket…
But after it has a module support, will you code in C++?
Not unless there’s a dagger on my throat
I’d rather learn Go, at least to learn something new, easy enough, speedy and with good concurrency/parallelism support.
To be honest, I did use C++ exclusively for a project a couple of years ago, and it went ok. The worst part was refactoring. I often need to refactor my code (not sure that’s a good sign) and doing so in C++ is pretty annoying, compared to the rapid re-development that Racket enables.
Correction: I couldn’t help but do the data/logs analysis in racket with plot 🙂
The studies ends with a bewildering thought: The morality of people who only get deliveries can never be assessed, leaving the rest of us in constant doubt and fear of their reactions
editor要ります。質問しましたから。
けどits大丈夫。しょうがんない。there’s no expectation or anything.