laurent.orseau
2022-7-1 07:00:56

(Maybe best for an official answer to be in Discourse I guess)


sorawee
2022-7-1 07:01:41

samth
2022-7-1 15:38:14

We don’t have any plans to move away from GitHub


laurent.orseau
2022-7-1 16:02:14

That’s reassuring. Hopefully you won’t get too much pressure. Though probably there would be a lot of resistance from most SFC members


jcoo092
2022-7-1 23:49:55

> GitHub’s decision to release a for-profit product derived from FOSS code, the SFC said, is “too much to bear.” I’m confused. They do something completely within the permissions (and, I’d argue, largely within the spirit) of the licenses, and that’s a problem? :confused:


sorawee
2022-7-1 23:52:00

They do? I thought it’s also trained on GPL code, and you can’t use any code derived from that commercially


sorawee
2022-7-1 23:53:16

Also, I thought several licenses require attribution. Copilot wouldn’t give you that.


jcoo092
2022-7-1 23:54:23

Hmm, that is a point I hadn’t remembered.


samth
2022-7-1 23:55:32

Whether copilot is violating the copyright of people who posted code on GitHub, and whether the results are derived work, is a question that there are lots of opinions about


samth
2022-7-2 00:00:13

Also whether it’s fair to build a paid product on the results of training on free software, which is a separate question


wanpeebaw
2022-7-2 01:11:14

Fun programming language. Source editor as a tree editor. https://youtu.be/v7oTTmbkI9w