
@notjack I’m working on connectors. Just noticed a potential issue with the net2/connector
module API as documented.

racket@connector.rkt> (define c (tcp-connector))
racket@connector.rkt> c
(connector #<procedure:connect-proc> #<custodian>)
racket@connector.rkt> (define t (connect! c (string->authority "<http://www.google.com:80\|www.google.com:80>")))
racket@connector.rkt> t
(transport
#<input-port:www.google.com>
#<output-port:www.google.com>
(authority (ip6 #"&\0lPa\177\315\373\36oe\377\376\237H/") 59472)
(authority (ip6 #"&\a\370\260@\2\b\a\0\0\0\0\0\0 \4") 80))

I saw the input-port
name was <http://www.google.com\|www.google.com>
.

Right now, we have no generic way to get the original domain name back. Do you think we should be storing that info with the connector
?

This is not blocking anything currently, and I don

’t see it being a problem in the near future.

I think the Right way to handle that would be reverse DNS lookup of the transport destination authority

I’m fine with that.

Should it be a net2
operation, or user defined?

ip->dns
?

Eventually I’d like DNS queries and lookups to be a thing mostly done in Racket instead of relying on the host machine’s implementation, but I haven’t planned that far ahead

Also, I think the connectors implementation is blocked on a bunch of disposable
implementation changes and feature additions

Getting familiar with that code and reading the issues might be a good next step in your axon integration efforts

I’ve been reading the disposable
code. The axon/net2
experiment is my disposables playground.

I’m also making axon/tcp
compliant with net2
APIs as I go, mainly to get an end-to-end feel for the design. Drop-in replacement of real net2
is a bonus.